CSE
Toss Index979.6 −2.00%Match Index3,412.8 +3.00%The Hundred 2026 · CSXM216 SB vs BP +3.00%M215 JKS vs KR −1.87%M214 SB-W vs BP-W +3.00%M213 MIL vs LS −1.36%M212 CLK vs DMS +3.67%M211 MIL-W vs LS-W +0.00%M210 WF vs TR +3.00%M209 WF-W vs TR-W +1.00%M208 GG vs KR +0.00%M207 SL vs MSG −3.33%Toss Index979.6 −2.00%Match Index3,412.8 +3.00%The Hundred 2026 · CSXM216 SB vs BP +3.00%M215 JKS vs KR −1.87%M214 SB-W vs BP-W +3.00%M213 MIL vs LS −1.36%M212 CLK vs DMS +3.67%M211 MIL-W vs LS-W +0.00%M210 WF vs TR +3.00%M209 WF-W vs TR-W +1.00%M208 GG vs KR +0.00%M207 SL vs MSG −3.33%
Cricket News

Delhi High Court dismisses PIL against BCCI using ‘Team India’ name

Delhi High Court dismisses PIL challenging BCCI’s use of the name “Team India,” allowing the cricket team to continue under its current banner.

BCCI
BCCI

The Delhi High Court has dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the use of the name “Team India” for the cricket team run by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI). The PIL argued that since the BCCI is a private organisation, it has no right to call its team the “Indian National Cricket Team” or use national symbols like the flag. The petition, filed by lawyer Reepak Kansal, claimed that when public broadcasters such as Doordarshan and All India Radio project the BCCI team as representing India, it misleads the public into thinking the team has official government recognition.

The plea also highlighted that the BCCI is registered under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975, and is not recognised as a statutory body or government authority. Also, it is not registered as a National Sports Federation eligible for government funding. Despite these claims, the Bench, led by Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, strongly rejected the PIL, calling it a “sheer wastage of time.”

The judges questioned the foundation of the plea, asking, “Are you saying that the team does not represent India?” The PIL had cited concerns under the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950, and the Flag Code of India, 2002, claiming that using the national flag and name for a private entity could harm the sanctity of national symbols and grant undeserved commercial legitimacy to the BCCI.

High Court Rejects PIL, Confirms BCCI’s Rights

The petition also argued that this practice allows a private association to profit in the name of the country. However, the High Court did not share the apprehensions. It asked the lawyer to improve the PIL in the future and completely dismissed the matter and effectively allowed the BCCI to use the name "Team India" for its cricket team.

See Also: List of Indian players who have previously played in Lanka Premier League (LPL)

This ruling once again confirms the BCCI’s unique status in Indian sports. Despite being a private organisation, it manages the country’s most popular sport while being widely recognised as the national cricket team by fans, media, and broadcasters. The order of the court reaffirms that the team can continue to be called "Team India" without legal restrictions.

About the Author

Gopi Marisetty
Written By

Gopi Marisetty

author · 2824 articles

A cricket lover who enjoys writing about every match, player, and record. With 1+ year of experience in cricket content writing, I love sharing simple and engaging stories from the game. I focus on match recaps, player insights, and exciting cricket moments, making each article easy to read and enjoyable for every fan.

Watch Now

Web Stories

It is not my job to announce the winner

Rohit Sharma on being asked if England were rightly awarded the World Cup title in 2019